With Love, Meghan

The Royal Family on Television

With the release of With Love, Meghan on Netflix, audiences are once again captivated by the intersection of royalty and television. Whether through documentaries, interviews, or scripted dramas, the British royal family has long been a subject of fascination, with their on-screen appearances often shaping public perception of the monarchy.

From groundbreaking broadcasts like Royal Family (1969) to scandalous interviews such as Diana’s Panorama confession (1995) and Prince Andrew’s disastrous Newsnight appearance (2019), television has both strengthened and challenged the monarchy over the years.

As With Love, Meghan offers a fresh perspective on one of the most talked-about modern royals, now is the perfect time to look back at the most significant royal TV moments—those that have entertained, shocked, and even changed history.


The Early Years: Embracing Television

The Queen’s First Televised Christmas Broadcast (1957, BBC & ITV)

Queen Elizabeth II’s annual Christmas message had been a tradition since 1932, originally delivered via radio. However, in 1957, she made history by bringing the address to television for the first time.

Sitting in her study at Sandringham House, the Queen spoke directly to the camera, acknowledging the changing times and the growing role of television:

“I very much hope that this new medium will make my Christmas message more personal and direct.”

This was a pivotal moment. The Queen’s decision to embrace television was a calculated move to modernise the monarchy and connect with a rapidly changing world.


The 1960s: A Royal Experiment in Reality TV

Royal Family (1969, BBC & ITV – Commissioned by the Queen & Prince Philip)

Decades before reality TV became mainstream, the British royal family allowed cameras unprecedented access into their daily lives.

Royal Family, a two-hour documentary, showed the Queen at home with her children, making small talk over breakfast, and even grilling sausages at Balmoral.

The goal? To humanise the monarchy and make them more relatable to the public. However, the experiment backfired. Critics argued that it eroded the mystique of the monarchy, making them seem too ordinary.

By the 1970s, the Queen ordered the documentary to be locked away, and it has rarely been seen since.


The 1970s: Royals on Children’s Television

Princess Anne’s Blue Peter Special (1971, BBC – Featuring Princess Anne & Valerie Singleton)

In a rare royal collaboration with children’s television, Princess Anne joined Blue Peter presenter Valerie Singleton on a trip to Ethiopia to highlight her charity work with Save the Children.

This was a groundbreaking royal TV moment—one of the first times a senior royal used television to engage with young audiences and promote a philanthropic cause.

The episode helped solidify Anne’s reputation as one of the hardest-working royals, dedicated to charitable service.


The 1980s: A PR Disaster and Changing Perceptions

It’s a Royal Knockout (1987, BBC – Featuring Prince Edward, Prince Andrew, Princess Anne & Sarah Ferguson)

The 1980s saw one of the most bizarre royal TV moments in history.

Prince Edward, hoping to modernise the royal image, organised It’s a Royal Knockout—a medieval-themed charity game show where members of the royal family dressed in costumes and competed in wacky physical challenges.

While intended as a fun and lighthearted event, the show was widely ridiculed. Edward’s frustrated reaction to the press afterwards—snapping, “Well, thanks for sounding so bloody enthusiastic!”—only made things worse.

The fallout from the show was so severe that it reportedly damaged Edward’s standing within the royal family.


The 1990s: Scandal, Divorce, and a Nation in Mourning

Panorama – Diana’s Bombshell Interview (1995, BBC – Featuring Princess Diana)

The 1990s were defined by royal scandal, and nothing was more explosive than Diana’s 1995 interview with Panorama.

Speaking candidly to Martin Bashir, Diana revealed:

“There were three of us in this marriage, so it was a bit crowded.”

She also discussed her struggles with bulimia, self-harm, and feeling isolated within the royal family. The interview sent shockwaves through the monarchy, ultimately leading to her divorce from Charles in 1996.

Years later, an inquiry revealed that Bashir had used deceitful tactics to secure the interview. This led to a major scandal for the BBC, and both Prince William and Prince Harry publicly condemned the broadcaster.

The Queen’s Address After Diana’s Death (1997, BBC & ITV)

Following Princess Diana’s tragic death in a car crash, public outrage erupted over the royal family’s silence.

In response, the Queen made a rare live broadcast, addressing the nation:

“She was an exceptional and gifted human being. In good times and bad, she never lost her capacity to smile and laugh.”

This moment marked a turning point in the monarchy’s relationship with public opinion, showing that they had to adapt to a more media-savvy world.


The 2010s: Dramas and Documentaries

The Crown (2016–2023, Netflix)

Netflix’s The Crown became a global phenomenon, chronicling Queen Elizabeth II’s reign in a highly dramatised style.

While beautifully made, the series has faced criticism for historical inaccuracies, particularly in later seasons. Despite this, it remains the most successful royal TV drama ever made.

Prince Andrew’s Newsnight Interview (2019, BBC)

Attempting to clear his name amid the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, Prince Andrew gave a widely condemned interview with Newsnight’s Emily Maitlis.

His lack of remorse and bizarre statements—such as claiming he couldn’t sweat—led to his withdrawal from royal duties.

The interview was later dramatised in Netflix’s Scoop (2024) and Amazon’s A Very Royal Scandal (2024).


The 2020s: A New Royal Era

Harry & Meghan’s Oprah Interview (2021, CBS & ITV)

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey was one of the most controversial royal TV moments in recent years.

Meghan spoke of racist remarks about their son Archie and feeling suicidal due to royal pressures.

Harry accused the royal family of failing to support them, leading to comparisons with Diana’s struggles.

10. Charles III: The Coronation Year (2024, BBC – Featuring King Charles III & Queen Camilla)

Following the death of Elizabeth II in 2022, King Charles III was the subject of this documentary chronicling his first year as monarch.

Offering behind-the-scenes access to his coronation, it showcased how Charles is navigating a modern monarchy.


Conclusion: The Monarchy & Television – A Complicated Relationship

From early experiments with television to modern controversies, the royal family’s relationship with TV has been complex and ever-evolving.

As With Love, Meghan brings the royals back into the media spotlight, it’s clear that their TV presence will continue to shape their legacy—sometimes for better, sometimes for worse.

Which royal television appearances do you remember? Which ones have you enjoyed the most? And which ones do you never want to see again?

European royal families are all interrelated

Are the Royal Family German?

Introduction

A common misconception about the British royal family is that they are “German.” This belief largely stems from historical dynastic marriages and the foreign origins of some past monarchs. However, while there are German connections within the family’s genealogy, the idea that they are fundamentally German is misleading. The British royal family has always been shaped by the country it serves, and its heritage is far more complex than a single national label suggests.

In this post, we will explore the origins of this misconception, the historical ties between the British monarchy and Germany, and how the modern royal family is unmistakably British. We will also consider the royal family’s broader European ancestry, before concluding with a remarkable fact: King Charles III, like every British monarch before him, can trace his lineage all the way back to Alfred the Great.


The Origins of the Misconception

The claim that the royal family is “German” largely arises from historical royal marriages, particularly from the 18th century onwards. Before that, English and later British monarchs had various European influences, including Norman, French, and Scottish ancestry. However, the German connection became more pronounced with the arrival of the House of Hanover in 1714.

The House of Hanover and the German Connection

When Queen Anne died in 1714 without an heir, the British throne passed to her closest Protestant relative, George, Elector of Hanover. But how was he connected to the previous ruling dynasty?

George I was the great-grandson of James I/VI, the Scottish king who inherited the English throne in 1603 and united the crowns of England and Scotland. James’s daughter, Elizabeth Stuart, married Frederick V of the Palatinate, and their daughter Sophia of Hanover became the designated heir to the British throne under the 1701 Act of Settlement, which barred Catholics from inheriting. Although Sophia died shortly before Anne, her son George succeeded instead, becoming the first monarch of the House of Hanover.

Despite his legitimate claim, George I’s connection to Britain was somewhat distant. He was born and raised in what is now Germany, spoke little English, and never fully integrated into British culture. However, his successors, particularly George III, were far more British in upbringing and identity.


The Transition from the House of Hanover to Windsor

By the time Queen Victoria ascended the throne in 1837, Britain was still ruled by a dynasty with German roots, though Victoria herself was born and raised in England. Her marriage to Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha in 1840 further strengthened ties with Germany. Their children married into numerous European royal families, making Victoria the so-called “Grandmother of Europe.”

The House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha

Upon Victoria’s death in 1901, her son, Edward VII, became king, marking the beginning of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. This name came from Prince Albert’s German lineage. However, Edward VII and his son, George V, were British-born and deeply committed to the country.

The Name Change in 1917

The most significant shift away from the monarchy’s German associations occurred during the First World War. Britain was at war with Germany, and anti-German sentiment was high. The royal family’s Germanic surname, Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, became a source of controversy, especially as German aircraft known as “Gotha bombers” were attacking Britain.

In response, King George V made a decisive move: in 1917, he officially changed the royal family’s name to the House of Windsor, inspired by Windsor Castle, a symbol of British heritage. This act not only distanced the monarchy from its German ties but also reinforced its British identity.

From that moment on, the House of Windsor has remained the reigning royal house of the United Kingdom.


The House of Windsor: A British Identity

Despite their historical German connections, British monarchs have always ruled as British sovereigns. The Windsor dynasty has repeatedly demonstrated loyalty to Britain, particularly during times of war.

The Royal Family in the World Wars

During the First World War, King George V’s decision to rebrand the royal house was not merely symbolic—it was a reflection of his deep-rooted British identity. Similarly, during the Second World War, King George VI and his family remained in Britain, enduring the Blitz alongside the public. Queen Elizabeth II (then Princess Elizabeth) even joined the Auxiliary Territorial Service, training as a mechanic, further cementing the family’s commitment to Britain.

Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, though born into the Greek and Danish royal families, fought for Britain during the Second World War. His loyalty to the United Kingdom was unwavering, and he became a key figure in modernising the monarchy.

These examples highlight how, despite a multinational lineage, the British royal family has always prioritised its duty to the United Kingdom.


The Modern Royal Family: A Multinational Heritage

It is important to remember that all European royal families are interconnected. The British royal family does not solely have German ancestry; their heritage also includes strong links to Scotland, Denmark, and Greece.

For instance:

  • Scottish ancestry: The royal lineage includes James VI of Scotland (who became James I of England), making modern British monarchs direct descendants of Scottish kings.
  • Danish ancestry: Queen Alexandra, wife of Edward VII, was Danish, further diversifying the royal bloodline.
  • Greek ancestry: Prince Philip’s heritage included Greek and Danish royalty, and his marriage to Queen Elizabeth II added another European influence to the family tree.

How Ancestry Expands Over Generations

One reason why many people today can claim distant royal ancestry is the mathematical reality of genealogy. Each of us has two parents, four grandparents, eight great-grandparents, and so on—the number of direct ancestors doubles with every generation. Going back just ten generations (roughly 300 years), a single person has over 1,000 direct ancestors.

For this reason, all living people—including the royal family—descend from a vast mix of different national and cultural backgrounds. Just as the Windsors have inherited lineages from various European royal houses, most people alive today have a far more diverse ancestry than they might expect.


An Unbroken Line to Alfred the Great

One of the most compelling facts about the British monarchy is its historical continuity. King Charles III, like every British monarch before him, can trace his ancestry back to Alfred the Great, the 9th-century King of Wessex.

Alfred is often considered the first true King of the English, having successfully defended his kingdom against Viking invasions and laid the foundations for a united England. Through centuries of royal succession, his bloodline has endured, passing through the medieval Plantagenets, the Tudors, the Stuarts, and ultimately to the modern Windsors.

This direct descent from Alfred the Great underscores the enduring British identity of the monarchy. Despite foreign marriages and shifting dynasties, the British royal family remains part of an unbroken lineage that stretches back over a thousand years.


Conclusion

While the British royal family has historical ties to Germany through dynastic marriages, they are undeniably British. The transition from the House of Hanover to Windsor, the monarchy’s steadfast loyalty to Britain in times of war, and their deep connections to British history all reinforce this fact.

Moreover, King Charles III’s descent from Alfred the Great highlights the monarchy’s ancient and uniquely British heritage. Although European royal families have always been interwoven, the identity of the House of Windsor is—and always has been—firmly rooted in Britain.

So, is the royal family German? No. They are, and always have been, British.

Working Royals

What is a royal?

The term “royal” often conjures images of crowns, palaces, and centuries-old traditions. However, what exactly constitutes a “royal” can vary depending on the context. In the modern British monarchy, there are several ways to define who is considered a royal. This article will explore three such definitions: holding the style “His/Her Royal Highness” (HRH), being a member of the royal family by descent or marriage, and being a working royal. Each of these definitions offers a different perspective on what it means to belong to the British royal family.

1. Holding the Style HM or HRH

One of the most formal and legally recognised ways to be considered a royal is by holding the style “His/Her Majesty” (HM) or “His/Her Royal Highness” (HRH). This designation has its roots in British legal tradition, specifically in the Letters Patent issued by King George V in 1917 and later updated by Queen Elizabeth II in 2012.

Historical Context

The Letters Patent of 1917 were issued by King George V during a time of anti-German sentiment during World War I. The letters were designed to limit the number of people entitled to the style HRH, focusing the title on the closest relatives of the monarch. Under these guidelines, only the children of the sovereign, the children of the sovereign’s sons, and the eldest living son of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales were entitled to the HRH style.

In 2012, Queen Elizabeth II issued a new Letters Patent to extend the HRH title to all children of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales, rather than just the eldest living son. This change ensured that all of Prince William’s children, not just Prince George, would hold the HRH title.

Current Royals with HRH Style

As of 2024, the individuals entitled to the HRH style are:

  • Charles III
  • Camilla (the wife of the King)
  • Prince William, Prince of Wales (eldest son of the King)
  • Catherine, Princess of Wales (wife of the Prince of Wales)
  • Prince George of Wales (eldest son of the Prince of Wales)
  • Princess Charlotte of Wales (daughter of the Prince of Wales)
  • Prince Louis of Wales (youngest son of the Prince of Wales)
  • Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex (younger son of the King)
  • Meghan, Duchess of Sussex (wife of the Duke of Sussex)
  • Prince Archie of Sussex (son of the Duke of Sussex)
  • Princess Lilbet of Sussex (daughter of the Duke of Sussex)
  • Princess Anne, The Princess Royal (daughter of Elizabeth II)
  • Prince Andrew, Duke of York (younger son of Elizabeth II)
  • Princess Beatrice, Mrs Mapelli Mozzi (elder daughter of the Duke of York)
  • Princess Eugenie, Mrs Brooksbank (younger daughter of the Duke of York)
  • Prince Edward, Duke of Edinburgh (youngest son of Elizabeth II)
  • Sophie, Duchess of Edinburgh (wife of the Duke of Edinburgh)
  • James, Earl of Wessex (son of the Duke of Edinburgh)
  • Lady Louise Windsor (daughter of the Duke of Edinburgh)
  • Prince Richard, Duke of Gloucester (grandson of George V)
  • Birgitte, Duchess of Gloucester(wife of the Duke of Gloucester)
  • Prince Edward, Duke of Kent (grandson of George V)
  • Katharine, Duchess of Kent (wife of the Duke of Kent)
  • Princess Alexandra (granddaughter of George V)
  • Prince Michael of Kent (grandson of George V)
  • Princess Michael of Kent (wife of Prince Michael of Kent)

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex and the Duke of York have agreed not to use their HRH styles except when on official royal family business.

James, Earl of Wessex and Lady Louise Windsor do not use the princely titles they are entitled to or their HRH styles.

Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet are entitled to HRH styles under the 1917 Letters Patent, but they have never yet used these styles.

2. Being a Member of the Royal Family

Another definition of being a royal is broader and includes anyone who is a direct descendant of Queen Elizabeth II or who is married to one of her descendants. This definition encapsulates a larger group, reflecting the extended royal family, which may include individuals who do not hold the HRH style but are nonetheless considered part of the royal family by virtue of their lineage or marriage.

Current Members of the Royal Family

As of 2024, the following individuals are considered members of the royal family by descent or marriage:

  • Charles III
  • Camilla (wife of the King)
  • Prince William, Prince of Wales (eldest son of the King)
  • Catherine, Princess of Wales (wife of the Prince of Wales)
  • Prince George of Wales (eldest son of the Prince of Wales)
  • Princess Charlotte of Wales (daughter of the Prince of Wales)
  • Prince Louis of Wales (youngest son of the Prince of Wales)
  • Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex (youngest son of the King)
  • Meghan, Duchess of Sussex (wife of the Duke of Sussex)
  • Princess Archie of Sussex (son of the Duke of Sussex)
  • Princess Lilibet of Sussex (daughter of the Duke of Sussex)
  • Princess Anne, The Princess Royal (sister of the King)
  • Vice Admiral Sir Timothy Laurence (husband of the Princess Royal)
  • Peter Phillips (son of the Princess of Wales)
  • Savannah Phillips (daughter of Peter Phillips)
  • Isla Phillips (daughter of Peter Phillips)
  • Zara Tindall (daughter of the Princess Roya)
  • Mike Tindall (husband of Zara Tindall)
  • Mia Tindall (daughter of Zara Tindall)
  • Lena Tindall (daughter of Zara Tindall)
  • Lucas Tindall (son of ZaraTindall)
  • Prince Andrew, Duke of York (younger brother of King)
  • Princess Beatrice, Mrs Mapelli Mozzi (eldest daughter of the Duke of York)
  • Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi (husband of Princess Beatrice)
  • Sienna Mapelli Mozzi (daughter of Princess Beatrice)
  • Princess Eugenie, Mrs Brooksbank (youngest daughter of the Duke of York)
  • Jack Brooksbank (husband of Princess Eugenie)
  • August Brooksbank (eldest son of Princess Eugenie)
  • Ernest Brooksbank (youngest son of Princess Eugenie)
  • Prince Edward, Duke of Edinburgh (youngest brother of the King)
  • Sophie, Duchess of Edinburgh (wife of the Duke of Edinburgh)
  • Lady Louise Windsor (daughter of the Duke of Edinburgh)
  • James, Earl of Wessex (son of Duke of Edinburgh)

This list represents the extended royal family, including younger generations who may not hold the HRH title but are nonetheless royals by descent.

3. Being a Working Royal

A more functional definition of being a royal involves being a “working royal.” This term refers to those members of the royal family who actively perform duties on behalf of the Crown. These duties include public appearances, charitable work, and representing the monarchy both within the United Kingdom and abroad. Under the reign of King Charles III, the number of working royals has been streamlined to focus on those closest to the line of succession.

Current Working Royals

As of 2024, the working royals under King Charles III are:

  • Charles III
  • Camilla
  • Prince William, Prince of Wales
  • Catherine, Princess of Wales
  • Princess Anne, The Princess Royal
  • Vice Admiral Sir Timothy Laurence (husband of the Princess Royal)
  • Prince Edward, Duke of Edinburgh
  • Sophie, Duchess of Edinburgh
  • The Duke of Gloucester
  • The Duchess of Gloucester
  • The Duke of Kent
  • Princess Alexandra

These individuals are the primary faces of the British monarchy, regularly engaging with the public and fulfilling official duties. The focus on a smaller group of working royals is part of Charles III’s vision for a more modern and efficient monarchy.

Conclusion

The concept of being a “royal” in the British context is multifaceted and can be defined in several ways. Whether through the formal title of HRH, lineage, marriage, or active service to the Crown, each definition captures a different aspect of royal life. Understanding these distinctions provides a deeper insight into the structure and functioning of the British royal family as it continues to evolve in the 21st century.